Azraeltheartist (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

hahaha the man who cried man bear pig rofl rofl rofl hahahaha

flashman201 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

i love it how he talks i never heard so fast and clear in my entire life!

stopsigndicknozer (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

less government and more hemp

jimacck (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Global warming, who cares? because if you think thats whats going to kill most of us, your all very wrong, remember most of the planet are still quite stupid, and they listen to who they think is inteligent. Also remember the planet is grossly over populated and what is the only thing that can solve this, it doesn't take a genius to work this out. so are you all still worried about global warming. have a nice day!

ted77756 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

You say I am a skeptic going on faith? Actually, I am saying you haven't provided the mathematical model. How can you make claims? You just go by everyone elses opinion. Plus you basic model might show some info. I agree with you, but I think you owe the general public some MATH on the blackboard. You are a smart education major. You are NOT a scientist. That's why this is unfair. Please try again and do the MATH on the blackboard.

ted77756 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

AGW is bunk!!!!!!! Since 1970, Michael Tabor "Chaos and Integratablity on Nonlinear Systems". You broke it down to a 2nd order mass damper system. Let's do the math together. To hell with a supercomputer. Since then we got the cross product for all those dumb physics theories that are totally wrong!! Proof: IEEE has alot of publications that have errors. Organizations make mistakes too.

ted77756 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Also, I am an expert. Those guys look like liars. A retard can solve the diff eq from the ozone aersol problem vs carbon in the atmosphere and how it produces climate change. Face reality. Show the diff eq. It's also for boneheads. The general public is beyond the PBS Seasame Street Program. We can handle a Diff Eq. You broke it down to spring damper. WE CAN KNOW! We don't need 1970 people. We can do this together as a society right now. No stupid 2nd sources.

ted77756 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Continued + Plus the size of an electron thru Milkian but done on a cloud with acid rain may solve this. Also Newton KE of Earth moving in space vs Thermo KE from Greenhouse effect needs to be considered. Although, not easy to prove it might rm that sigma. The point is we can know. And!!! We can prove it to the public!! Then funding is realistic. Scare tactics are NOT science. So business 101 is not a fair approach. And I know you are smart enough to solve the diff eq.

ted77756 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

You said we can't know. So we need risk assesment. Ironically you gave a gaussian expectation with small sigma. Hence, Markov. We can know. You even have a graph from 300 years ago and show fundament harmonic, but forget about the graph fundamental harmonic??

blahgirl37 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

nice metaphors, this guy is making a very intelligent argument.