corderoatado20 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Ricardo el finito lopez,mmmmm que yo recuerde tenia 11 o 12 defensas gran boxeador ese...pero no se compara a Monzon,ya que Monzon además de tener 14 defensas tenía su caracteristica resistencia y una complejidad excelente.RICARDO LOPEZ NO DERROTO A CAMPEONES MUNDIALES COMO NINO BENVENUTI QUE ESTUVIERON DURANTE 5 AÑOS CAMPEON,NI MUCHO MENOS DE LA MANERA QUE LOS DERROTO MONZON,PORQUE ADEMAS DE NOCKEARLOS,LOS RETIRABA. Ricardo Lopez retiro a todos los campeones que enfrento???

emfedor (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

un solo nombre ricardo "el finito" lopez hizo 22 defensas se retiro invicto tuvo los cinturones AMB-CMB-FIB y OMB en los paja defendio en todos los lugares y tambie en los mosca tuvo los CMB y AMB, es el unico boxeador ke se subia kon 6 cinturones todos legitimos y los defendio en china, japon, usa, puerto rico, thailandia, españa, alemania, turkia, philipinas, colombia, panama y mexico, el es el ke tiene el record por si no savias es el uniko boxeador ke se a retirado invicto y campeon

gamedog777 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

deja de hablar boludeces,hay gente q mato muchas mas personas y ,o tiene como idolo.aperte que tiene qver la vida intima?eltipo como boxeador era el MEJOR grabatelo defendio 14 veces el titulo yse retiro campeon.nombrame algunos q hayan hecho lo mismo.

corderoatado20 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Emfedor la verdad que es un comentario estúpido e irrelevante el que pusiste,además de ser una utopía porque Monzon nunca va a salir de nuestras mentes... No calificamos su vida privada,calificamos su maravillosa habilidad arriba del ring,eso es lo que nos hace idolatrarlo,yo por mi parte soy fanatico de Bonavena,y Bonavena le pegaba a su esposa pero no tiene nada que ver con el boxeo,yo no deje de idolatrarlo por eso. Monzon en sí era un ignorante pero y que? FUE EL MEJOR BOXEADOR!

07091102 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Monzon was clearly the best of his era. Hearns was a very very good boxer technically and a massive puncher who ko'd world champions in every division from welter to light heavy. His weakness was sometimes stamina and he didn't have the best chin if caught. Monzon wasn't a big puncher + often went the distance v Briscoe, Valdez,Griffith etc. He would have to try and wear Hearns down+ go for a later stoppage. I think Hagler was better though. Also higher standard of middleweights in the 1980's

07091102 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

The best middleweight ever? In a division that has had Robinson, Hagler, Hopkins+ Toney that is some claim. Very good boxer. I think he was a little one dimensional at times+ often fought smaller opponents. Many of them ageing welterweights moving up. e.g Benevuti, Griffith, Durable, good stamina. I think Hagler was a better athlete, stronger+ had more variety in attack. Monzon V Hearns? Would have been a good fight. Possibly Monzon in later rounds, IF he could survive Hearns early attack...

AnonimusDominee (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Carlos Monzon was a great fighter...best ever in the middleweight cat. It´s impossible compare him but fighters from modern times...but is sure he can beat Hearns and Haggler. Hearns had a cristal jaw, and Haggler well would be a great show.

judaschongo (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Monzon was a complete fighter and the greatest middleweight imo. He would of easily defeated Hearns by KO or TKO in under 5.

ptldjk (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Predictions..... Winner btwn Monzon and Hearns????

flyinghotwing (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

he had good tecnique skinny light lets and a bigger torso with good upper body strenth to put power behind his shots specially once he had a man hurt with his size, but i dont think he met the greater bunch of middleweights, a good thing for him of course and off the subject he beat his wife and then eventually killed himself.