PrincessDrRe (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Why the black babe had to be eatin' watermelon? Why the Asian baby had to be sooooo occupied by a top - only to entertain? It's not racist - in it's time. As in it's time this was not considered ignorant. Now it would be considered ignorant.

murdocgorillaz222 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

i agree with the others - despite its obvious racial problems, it was normal for the time and this will never ceease to be an adorable timeless classic. you'll never find a cartoon drawn and animated as smoothly as this ever again! its all CG crud... Betty Boop- legend.

rabsmiff (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

sublime toon; truly impeccable, old chap.

FutileFreakX (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

omg they should havent have banned this! its hysterical!... other than the whole racist part...

the7thwreck (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

does anyone actually find this cartoon racist? (not including PC loving whites)

sirsniffy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Wow. Then again, there were many prevailing stereotypes of that period that were pretty much accepted in everyday life. It's still a cute cartoon.

Morpun (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

EXACTLY all the more racist back then

fatoldjew (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

This is from 1935.

MEGAGUY21 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

hahaha this was a good cartoon!! those babies got skillz!!! but damn! they pull no punches on the black people. 3 black babies all pin togather by a gaint saftey pin, they were behind what appaers to be a farm of some sort, and to top it off get lead off stage by a trey carrying a big slice of watermelon!! geez but whatever it surpisly entaining.

zid902002 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Well, the baby was shooting things with his toy rifle and I kept thinking bout the Japanese and World War II. That's why I asked when this was made. I don't know if that was intentional or not.